Wednesday, January 31, 2007

Safety and Dirty Jobs

I've talked before about what a fan I am of both the show Dirty Jobs and its host Mike Rowe. Not only is the guy funnier than hell, he'll sing you a tune. I became a bigger fan of his tonight after reading this piece by him on workplace safety.

I sincerely appreciate your concern for me and agree that stupidity plays an ongoing role in my professional and personal life. But believe me, I have no wish to be injured on the job.

However, it is not the objective of Dirty Jobs to conform to any particular set of safety standards, other than those dictated by the people for whom I happen to be working at the time. I take my cues from them and I assume whatever risk they assume, for the most part. In the end, we hope to capture an honest look at what life is like for the workers in a particular venue. We do not aspire to set an example or be a poster child for OSHA or any particular industry. I realize that may sound controversial but it's the truth and not nearly as inflammatory as what I'm going to say next.

Ready?

Of all the platitudes automatically embraced in the workplace — and there are many — there is none more pervasive, erroneous, overused and dangerous than "Safety First!" in my opinion. I have heard this slogan countless times. I have seen it emblazoned on banners, T-shirts and hats. I have sat through mandatory briefings, slideshows and presentations designed to "protect me from the hazards at hand." And I have listened as safety officers and foremen have run down list after list of OSHA requirements, all apparently construed to remind me that nothing is more important to the employer than my own well-being.

What a load of unmitigated nonsense.

In the 120+ jobs I have seen thus far, I can tell you with certainty, that safety, while always a major consideration, is never the priority.

Never.
Never, ever.
Not even once.

Is it important? Of course. But is it more important than getting the job done? No. Not even close. Making money is more important than safety — always — and it's very dangerous, in my opinion, to ignore that. When we start to believe that someone else is more concerned about our own safety than we are, we become complacent and then we get careless. When a business tells you that they are more concerned with your safety than anything else, beware. They are not being honest. They are hedging their own bets and following the advice of lawyers hired to protect them from lawsuits arising from accidents.

You are correct to suggest that wearing safety glasses would have made the task at hand safer. But why stop there? Wearing a helmet would have made it safer still. And wearing a steel-mesh shark suit would have made it really super-safe. I know that sounds glib and I know that many will wish to scold me for appearing cavalier. But really, I'm not. In a car, I wear a safety belt. On a motorcycle, I wear a helmet. Not because it's the law, but because it seems a reasonable precaution. And ultimately, the only one responsible for my own safety is me. (Besides, if the government were really concerned with my safety above all else, wouldn't they drop the legal speed limit to 30 miles an hour and make cars out of rubber?)

Again, you're right — I probably should have been wearing safety glasses, not because safety is first, but because I like to hedge my bets. We can always be safer. We can always assume less risk. But if safety were really first, I wouldn't travel at all or engage in any activity that required me to assume any risk. And I certainly wouldn't be hosting Dirty Jobs.

Like most sensible concepts, rational safety is all about balance. But the problem with balance is that you can never maintain it without constantly adjusting. Which means, we are always slightly out of balance, one way or the other.

When are we too reckless? When are we overly cautious? Opinions will vary about where safety should rank on society's list of desirable conditions. But one thing seems certain — safety has never been first, at home or at work. And the current effort to make it so is way out of balance.

And that, ironically, is dangerous.

Mike

Monday, January 29, 2007

Some More Jews Provoke An Innocent Palestinian Into Killing Them

They were sitting in a coffee shop EXISTING. They were Jews and alive. How provocative!

Apparently a couple of groups have already confessed to the murders. The Palestinian "government" has issued a statement applauding the intentional killing of these innocent people.

Hey... I have an idea. Let's give these people a state with an army and everything. They won't try to kill innocent people then.

Stay tuned to Israelicool for all the updates.

Does anyone out there remember a column that Lileks wrote about one of these maybe 4 years ago? It talked about a little girl who was on a bus which was bombed.

A whole bunch of peace activists get waxed in Baghdad

Here's some video of some of our guys and Iraqis fighting together against people who want America to abandon Iraq.

I don't know if Jack Murtha was killed in the fighting. I do know he shares the goal of those who were.

Monday, January 22, 2007

Vacation contest

Everyone I haven't been married to is eligible. Everyone else, please stay away from me.

If you were to go somewhere with 6-8 of your friends for 5-7 days in a couples format, where would you choose? This is currently my top pick. Please keep your suggestions within the realm of possibilities. No Bali or anything like that.

Whomever picks the best place wins my warmest personal regards!

Friday, January 12, 2007

I'm not sure what to say

It's early in the morning.

I just found out that two of my friends are getting divorced. She cheated on him. They have kids. I wish there was a way to make people understand how much that hurts before it happens.